Some of the attention-grabbing occasions on the World Indoor Championships didn’t happen within the Emirates Enviornment however a few miles away as a substitute at a Coaches’ Membership get-together on St Vincent Road in Glasgow metropolis centre. Fantastically organised by former British athletics teaching supremo Frank Dick and supported by World Athletics, the ultimate afternoon included a presentation on the controversial lengthy bounce proposals.
Jakob Larsen and Florian Weber took to the stage to clarify the background to the concepts adopted by an interview with Jon Ridgeon, the World Athletics chief govt who inadvertently broke the information about plans for a “boardless lengthy bounce” throughout a podcast earlier this 12 months.
Listening to World Athletics’ aspect of the story in additional element, it was not possible to not have sympathy for them. The concept has been lambasted however is in a really early testing part and has to clear a number of hurdles earlier than will probably be launched at main worldwide occasions in 2026 on the earliest.
It’s one in every of 4 lengthy bounce improvements that World Athletics is . Additionally, there isn’t a assure it’s going to even be launched. In different phrases, it’s not the fait accompli that many assume it’s.
Ridgeon mentioned World Athletics had an obligation to have a look at potential adjustments as a result of information tells them that sure occasions are struggling to take care of their attraction in an more and more aggressive sporting world. Present lengthy bounce guidelines, he added, had been invented nicely over a century in the past when there was no tv or social media, to not point out the form of hi-tech tools that has the flexibility to revolutionise the game if we make sensible use of it.
In fact the concepts aren’t notably new. Based on fantasy and legend, Jesse Owens jumped additional than 9 metres within the Thirties when the necessity to hit a take-off board was eliminated. As well as, there’s a chapter dedicated to “the boardless lengthy and triple bounce” within the sensible 1993 e book The Way forward for Monitor & Area by masters athlete and Stanford professor Alphonse Juilland.
Following present world No.1 Miltos Tentoglou’s extensively publicised criticism of the concepts, although, along with four-time Olympic lengthy bounce champion Carl Lewis’s fierce feedback on social media, there have been some voices of discontent on the Coaches’ Membership occasion itself. Teaching giants Yannick Tregaro and Charles van Commenee requested some difficult questions, though Dick defended World Athletics’ efforts by encouraging his fellow coaches to have an open thoughts and to not kill an concept “when it’s a child”.
Miltos Tentoglou (Getty)
Tregaro and Van Commenee weren’t the one coaches within the room, nevertheless it was a comparatively sparsely attended occasion. To be truthful, further viewers had been capable of tune into the convention through Zoom and the ultimate session of the World Indoor Championships was set to start round an hour after the lengthy bounce presentation. Nonetheless, it’s a disgrace Larsen, Weber and Ridgeon had such a small viewers.
Herein lies an issue. On one hand World Athletics claims it’s eager to bear a rigorous ‘session’ course of with clear communication of their concepts to alter the game. But on the flipside, Ridgeon admits his podcast feedback on the brand new guidelines slipped out and that the broader athletics neighborhood unintentionally heard in regards to the concepts “too quickly”.
What’s extra, Larsen, Weber and Ridgeon clearly put a whole lot of effort and time into preaching to a restricted variety of individuals at this Coaches’ Membership occasion. So it’s a disgrace the occasion was no more extensively accessible on YouTube, for instance.
As a curious spectator and long-time AW author attending the occasion, I used to be additionally discouraged from reporting on any of the knowledge proven on the presentation slides and my request for a replica of the video recording of the session was politely rejected.
“The session was to tell/alternate with coaches onsite solely,” I used to be advised, “with the recording for inner use”. All of which is a pity as I’d have loved writing a extra detailed article on these attention-grabbing and much-talked about proposals.
Parkrun bosses stand agency
Indoor athletics apart, the preferred articles on the AW web site this month relate to parkrun and its resolution to eliminate course and age class information.
Our story on a parkrun petition has gathered extra clicks these days than something we’ve written about Josh Kerr, Molly Caudery, Femke Bol and even the controversial lengthy bounce proposals. That is partly as a result of the story is just not over, with hundreds of parkrunners persevering with to heap strain on parkrun organisers and decision-makers.
Parkrun chief govt Russ Jefferys isn’t budging both. In a letter to the parkrunners campaigning to carry again the stats, he mentioned: “We’ve got seen the petition and we’re listening to the suggestions we obtain. It’s a signal of a passionate and vibrant international neighborhood that parkrunners discover curiosity and inspiration in all types of knowledge related with participation (each our personal and that of others). Certainly there may be possible no finish to the info and data that is perhaps of curiosity, however that doesn’t imply it’s proper for parkrun to publish it.
“We’re in little doubt that the elimination of some information is a proportionate and applicable step for the charity and according to our mission to remodel well being and happiness by empowering individuals to come back collectively to be lively, social and outdoor.”
Their 23,000-strong petition apart, a variety of parkrunners have created t-shirts which say “carry again the stats” and one runner with a “Run 5K” registration plate has additionally put a “carry again our stats” message on his car.

Perhaps athletes ought to swap spikes for studs
It appears social media lights up each few months with some form of ‘footballer vs athlete’ dash comparability. This month it was Kylian Mbappe’s flip to be in comparison with Usain Bolt with the French striker estimated to run 100m in 10.9.
Virtually half a century in the past Malcolm MacDonald, the previous England striker, ran 10.9 in a Superstars dash conflict with David Hemery, the 1968 Olympic 400m hurdles champion, on a cinder observe in Rotterdam. Ever since, there was a normal fascination in simply how fast footballers are in comparison with professional sprinters.
Why not flip the script, although? What I’d actually wish to see is a group of athletes taking over the footballers at their very own sport. It may not be as one-sided as you assume both.
A couple of years in the past on the eve of the FIFA World Cup, AW revealed an ‘dream group’ of athletes similar to Hicham El Guerrouj, who was a eager goalkeeper earlier than he went on to turn out to be world record-holder for 1500m and the mile, Darren Campbell, European 100m and Olympic 4x100m gold medallist who performed soccer for a number of groups together with Plymouth Argyle, plus Adam Gemili, who was in Chelsea’s youth academy earlier than turning to athletics.

Our selection of supervisor hasn’t aged nicely, although, as we picked Lamine Diack, who managed Senegal within the Sixties earlier than he was given a purple card for his infamous spell as corrupt president of athletics’ international governing physique.
Extremely-runners snare a dragon
Dragons’ Den entrepreneur Steven Bartlett moved rapidly to strike a £100,000 cope with two businessmen from an ultra-running occasions firm known as One Hundred. In truth fellow dragons on the BBC present didn’t have even the prospect to place in a counter bid.
But maybe Bartlett ought to have slowed down with the intention to ask the entrepreneurs extra questions first.
For starters they advised the dragons they wished to create a “path working world championships” they usually recommended their concept for a path ultra-running international sequence for occasions over 100km or 100 miles was authentic and “pioneering”.
But have they not heard of the UTMB World Sequence, for instance, or the World Mountain and Path Champs held in Austria final summer time and Chiang Mai the 12 months earlier than?
Joao Andrade, one of many two businessmen from the One Hundred sequence, advised AW: “Our occasion stands distinct as the primary endurance path world championship, emphasising endurance path with distances of 100km, 100mile, and 200-mile. Our championship is exclusive as a consequence of its adherence to particular guidelines and course pointers, the inclusion of particular endurance path rankings primarily based on efficiency and a construction comprising qualifying phases that lead as much as an annual remaining. This format and the distances we provide differentiate our championship from present competitions.”
Similiarly, with regards the UTMB sequence, Andrade says his One Hundred occasions characteristic a variety of variations. “UTMB doesn’t embody a 200-mile race,” for instance, he says, “or a remaining occasion primarily based on qualifying races primarily based on efficiency.”
He provides: “Individually our championship additionally goals to professionalize the game by providing a major prize purse of $100,000, highlighting our dedication to supporting skilled athletes. Though UTMB lately launched their World Sequence, our championship had already been launched the 12 months earlier than.
“Regardless of these variations, our focus stays on being a World Championship for Endurance Path Operating, distinct from the codecs and distances provided by UTMB or some other sequence.”
If the One Hundred sequence is struggling to get its message out, nonetheless, then teaming up with Bartlett ought to assist. Other than being a ‘dragon’, the 31-year-old runs The Diary of a CEO podcast and is an knowledgeable in advertising and marketing.
From Valbymania to FitzGerald Fever
As ‘Valbymania’ continues to comb throughout the American collegiate scene courtesy of Parker Valby’s record-breaking exploits, one other younger feminine distance-running mega-talent, Innes FitzGerald, loved one other large win on the UK Inter-Counties Championships on Saturday.
Below-20 winners of those de facto British cross-country titles in Nottingham on Saturday earned automated choice to the World Cross Nation Championships in Belgrade on March 30. Solely drawback is that FitzGerald says she’s unlikely to take up her spot as a consequence of her reluctance to fly and need to give attention to upcoming A-level exams.
Don’t be stunned to see her on the World Below-20 Championships in Peru in August, although. It appears like sacrilege for an eco-friendly athlete who hates the concept of flying. However, publish A-levels, I feel she’s going to adore it and, crucially, she turns 18 in April so will be capable to make her personal thoughts up.
FitzGerald is an environmentally-friendly runner for positive, however there may be additionally a sense that, so far, she’s come underneath important parental strain to not fly.
Innes FitzGerald (Gary Mitchell)
Ingebrigtsen vs Kerr is tame in comparison with the Nineteen Eighties
The trash discuss between Jakob Ingebrigtsen and Josh Kerr is undeniably entertaining, however at this time’s followers get pleasure from solely a fraction of the hype and intrigue that Seb Coe and Steve Ovett generated within the Nineteen Eighties. As latest weeks have proven, the run-up to this 12 months’s 1500m on the Paris Video games shall be thrilling, however it’s going to absolutely battle to match the hype of the ‘Covett’ countdown to the Moscow Olympics.
Equally, for these ready on tenterhooks for the much-hyped Netflix sequence about sprinters, tv within the Nineteen Eighties had quite a few prolonged documentaries in regards to the sport’s main stars, lots of which will be discovered on YouTube.
Had been athletics followers from yesteryear spoiled? Or are rose-tinted spectacles in charge?
» Subscribe to AW journal right here



















