Being a Formulation 1 steward is a troublesome gig at the most effective of instances. However the stress of a world championship combat brings a a lot increased degree of scrutiny.
Each determination which comes from the stewards’ workplace all of the sudden has the potential to swing the championship consequence a technique or one other.
That was the case on the final spherical when Oscar Piastri obtained a hotly-debated penalty for tangling with Andrea Kimi Antonelli on the restart. Charles Leclerc, the harmless sufferer of their conflict, reckoned Antonelli was not less than as a lot in charge as Piastri, however the stewards disagreed, laying the blame solely on the McLaren driver’s ft.
His 10-second penalty price him eight valuable factors – a major chunk of his 24-point deficit to championship chief Lando Norris. Piastri could appear arduous accomplished by, however he’s actually not the primary contender to rue the stewards’ interference within the title combat.
10: Moss’s proof helps Hawthorn beat him, 1958
The specter of disqualification hung over Mike Hawthorn’s head after the Portuguese Grand Prix in 1958. He had gone into the race on the prime of the standings, main Stirling Moss by simply six factors (equal to second place then).
The stewards suspected Hawthorn had pushed in opposition to the observe route whereas restarting his Ferrari following a last-lap spin. He obtained assist from an surprising supply: Moss, who had noticed Hawthorn’s transfer, instructed the authorities his automobile had been on the pavement on the time, outdoors the observe limits.
This was beneficial testimony at a time when stewards didn’t have piles of video proof and GPS knowledge to depend on. It bought Hawthorn off the hook: and he beat Moss to the title by some extent.
The concept in the present day’s drivers may do the identical is unthinkable. Because the final spherical confirmed even these competing over locations outdoors the factors are fast to report any perceived rule-breaking by their rivals – no matter accuracy.
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
9: Hamilton’s delayed Security Automotive penalty outrages Alonso, 2010
The 2010 world championship was in the end determined in a four-way combat on the remaining race between Fernando Alonso, Lewis Hamilton and the Pink Bull drivers. Eventual champion Sebastian Vettel was solely fifth within the standings when the sector arrived at Valencia for the ninth spherical.
Alonso was third, chasing factors chief Hamilton, when an enormous crash prompted the looks of the Security and Medical vehicles. Hamilton hesitated as they appeared within the pit lane exit alongside him, then pressed on, passing the Security Automotive after they arrived on the exit line collectively. The Ferraris behind him fell in behind the Security Automotive queue.
Had Hamilton been not sure about whether or not he was allowed to succeed in the pit exit line earlier than the Security Automotive? He had made a expensive mistake throughout a Security Automotive interval a yr earlier in Melbourne. Or had he tried to lure the Ferrari drivers behind it, figuring out they’d lose a major period of time behind it?
Regardless, by making certain he bought by Hamilton gained sufficient time to finish his pit cease throughout the Security Automotive interval with out dropping a place. Though he was given a drive-through penalty for passing the Security Automotive, it took the stewards 10 laps to problem it. Within the meantime Alonso had grow to be trapped behind Kamui Kobayashi’s Sauber and was infuriated to see Hamilton emerge forward of them after serving his penalty.
After ending seventh, an incandescent Alonso mentioned the choice and its timing was “unfair” and “utterly destroyed the race” for him. “We have to apologise to the 60 to 70 thousand individuals who got here to see this type of race,” he added.
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
8: Montoya’s tangle with Schumacher’s staff mate, 2003
One other championship the place a number of drivers remained within the hunt till the latter phases. Heading into the penultimate spherical at Indianapolis, Michael Schumacher led Juan Pablo Montoya by simply three factors, equal to sixth place on the time.
Montoya ought to have exercised extra warning as he tried to go Schumacher’s staff mate, nonetheless. Rubens Barrichello had no cause to be beneficiant in direction of his rival, and a 50-50-move led to contact which put the Ferrari driver out.
Again within the days earlier than the stewards might problem five- and ten-second time penalties they issued fewer sanctions to drivers for contact. Nonetheless Montoya had already been given an astonishing penalty for a collision with Schumacher in Malaysia the yr earlier than, so his drive-through penalty got here as much less of a shock. That plus a gradual refuelling pit cease later within the race ended his title probabilities that weekend.
7: Villeneuve’s race underneath attraction, 1997
The information that championship contender Jacques Villeneuve had been disqualified from the penultimate spherical of the championship earlier than it had even began was understandably seismic. He had fallen sufferer to a recently-introduced rule punishing drivers for failing to decelerate for yellow flags.
Villeneuve was one in every of six drivers, together with title rival Schumacher, who did not gradual sufficiently as they handed Jos Verstappen’s stranded Tyrrell on the exit of Suzuka’s Spoon curve throughout follow. Nonetheless the Williams driver had extra ‘priors’ than the others, so whereas all of them obtained suspended bans, his was utilized.
He was allowed to race underneath attraction, however subsequently disqualified. Schumacher gained the race and flipped a nine-point deficit right into a single-point lead heading right into a finale which proved much more controversial.
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
6: Verstappen’s brake check on Hamilton, 2021
There have been sufficient hotly disputed calls throughout Hamilton and Max Verstappen’s bitter 2021 championship combat to fill a complete prime 10.
Pink Bull unsuccessfully lobbied for Hamilton to obtain a harsher penalty after the pair tangled at Silverstone. Verstappen responded with what regarded like a retaliatory transfer at Monza. There have been arguments over Hamilton’s rear wing and whether or not Verstappen interfered with it in parc ferme, yellow flag infringements and numerous on-track incidents.
Come the penultimate race in Jeddah, Verstappen was attempting every part he might to maintain Hamilton at bay, together with reducing the observe to remain forward. At one level, fearing a penalty, Pink Bull suggested him to let Hamilton previous. Verstappen tried to take action instantly earlier than a DRS detection level, so he might instantly re-pass the Mercedes. Hamilton, clever to this, hung again.
Verstappen went additional, jamming on the brakes and inflicting a collision. The stewards discovered him in breach of the Worldwide Sporting Code which forbids driving “unnecessarily slowly, erratically or in a fashion deemed probably harmful to different drivers.” They identified his braking stress throughout the second deceleration, which occured with Hamilton instantly behind him, registered 69 bar.
For that, they handed him a 10-second time penalty which proved inconsequential to his ending place. Even drivers not concerned within the title combat have been stunned by the leniency of the decision. Norris joked he would “attempt brake testing” one in every of his rivals on the subsequent race. “It’s solely a 10-second penalty.”
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
5: Alonso’s qualifying fury, 2006
“I don’t think about F1 a sport anymore,” fumed Alonso after the stewards deleted his three quickest lap instances in qualifying for the 2006 Italian Grand Prix. With championship rival Schumacher lining up on the entrance row, the choice which dropped Alonso 5 locations to tenth put his 12-point lead in jeopardy.
Alonso, who had been delayed by a puncture early in Q3 at Monza, was belatedly beginning his final lap when he was caught by Schumacher’s staff mate Felipe Massa. Massa drew shut sufficient to be affected by the slipstream of Alonso’s automobile, which the stewards accepted as grounds for a penalty.
The principles have been later revised to permit extra leniency in such conditions, however for Alonso the harm was already accomplished. Schumacher took most benefit on Sunday, profitable whereas Alonso dropped out with engine failure, leaving the pair separated by two factors with three rounds to go.
4: Hamilton’s win handed to Massa, 2008
Hamilton led the factors with the Ferrari drivers for firm on the Belgian Grand Prix in 2008. Kimi Raikkonen labored his common Spa-Francorchamps magic for a lot of the race however a late rain bathe introduced Hamilton onto his tail.
A riveting back-and-forth ensued, throughout which period Raikkonen pressured Hamilton large on the clumsy, recently-built chicane on the finish of the lap. Hamilton gave the place again, then repassed Raikkonen on the subsequent nook. The combat went on and was solely determined when Raikkonen spun right into a barrier.
Or so it appeared. However after the trophies had been handed out the stewards determined Hamilton hadn’t accomplished sufficient to revive the benefit he’d gained by going off and issued a post-race 25-second penalty. That handed victory to Raikkonen’s staff mate Massa, who had by no means figured within the battle on the entrance, and dropped Hamilton to 3rd behind Nick Heidfeld.
The choice clearly nonetheless rankled with Hamilton a few years later when he described how the FIA “screwed” him in a video titled “lesson to my youthful self”. “They may say it’s okay so that you can let Kimi by and that you just’ve accomplished sufficient,” he recalled, “and on the finish of the race they won’t allow you to maintain that win.”
It was not a classic yr for the stewards, who two rounds later ignored Renault’s outrageous piece of dishonest within the Singapore Grand Prix. ‘Crashgate’ solely got here to mild the next yr, and is now the matter of a court docket case introduced by Massa.
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
3: Schumacher’s Silverstone nightmare, 1994
The circumstances which led to Michael Schumacher being disqualified from one race and banned from two extra started with a driving error which was compounded by errors by each his staff and the stewards. The matter finally ended up earlier than the FIA’s World Motor Sport Council which, tellingly, didn’t confine its punishments to Schumacher, but additionally took motion in opposition to Benetton and a race official.
It started when Schumacher overtook his championship rival and British Grand Prix pole-winner Damon Hill throughout each pre-race formation laps. The stewards issued a five-second stop-go penalty, which Benetton later claimed to have misunderstood, regardless of it being described as such within the race broadcast.
As Benetton did not carry Schumacher in to serve his penalty, he was proven the black flag. This prompted an argument within the pits between the officers and Benetton which led to Schumacher serving the unique penalty and racing on to complete second.
The FIA was deeply unimpressed with all of this and subsequently enforced Schumacher’s disqualification and banned him from the subsequent two races. They added a half-million greenback effective for Benetton and suspended the superlicence of clerk of the course Pierre Aumonier for the dealing with of the incident.
The choice had big implications for the championship. Earlier than his disqualification, Schumacher’s lead stood at 32 factors. The choice minimize it to 26 – and meant Hill had two Schumacher-free races to take a 20-point chunk out of his deficit, which he duly did. One other controversial incident awaited on the finish of the season, although the stewards didn’t rule on that.
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
2: Masi’s unprecedented name suggestions title combat, 2021
The 2021 world championship got here to an explosively controversial conclusion within the remaining laps of the season at Yas Marina. The Security Automotive appeared late within the race as Hamilton led, on track for the title, pursued by Verstappen.
The Mercedes driver wasn’t far sufficient forward to pit for alternative tyres, however Verstappen was in a position to. Nonetheless as the ultimate laps ticked down race director Michael Masi initially determined there wouldn’t be time to carry a restart.
Below fierce lobbying from Pink Bull, Masi relented, and took the unprecedented determination to solely permit the lapped vehicles between the championship leaders to rejoin the lead lap. This was a transparent contradiction of previous follow and Masi’s personal phrases 12 months earlier.
“That is getting manipulated man,” mentioned Hamilton on his radio, whereas Verstappen took the lead and the title on the final lap. Mercedes shortly launched two protests, one in every of which identified Masi had did not comply with the foundations governing the restart.
The stewards rejected Mercedes’ claims and upheld the race end result confirming Verstappen as champion. However three months later the FIA admitted Masi had made a mistake; by then, he had already been fired as F1 race director.
Mercedes staff principal Toto Wolff has been scathing of Masi’s actions, accusing him of costing Hamilton a record-breaking eighth world championship. “There may be one lunatic who can mainly destroy the report of the best champion of all time,” he mentioned final month.
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
1: Senna’s disqualification makes Prost champion, 1989
The better controversy of the 1989 Japanese Grand Prix was not the query of whether or not Alain Prost meant to take out Ayrton Senna when the pair collided on the chicane whereas disputing the lead. The true scandal was the stewards’ subsequent determination to disqualify Senna from the race, which in the end determined that yr’s world championship.
Following the infamous collision between the pair, Prost shortly jumped out of his automobile whereas Senna tried to proceed. He rejoined by way of the escape street on the exit of the chicane. There could possibly be no query of him gaining a bonus by doing so, as he misplaced a substantial period of time and needed to pit to switch a broken entrance wing.
Nonetheless of their subsequent listening to the stewards instructed Senna he ought to have rotated with a view to rejoin the observe. He identified this might have put him prone to being hit head-on by one other automobile, and is forbidden by the foundations. Furthermore, different drivers that yr had used escape roads at different circuits to rejoin the observe in the identical manner with out penalty, together with Prost at Imola.
Senna gained the Suzuka race ‘on the street’ forward of Alessandro Nannini and the 2 Williams drivers. The choice to disqualify Senna was taken hurriedly sufficient that Senna was not allowed to take part within the podium ceremony.
When McLaren introduced a protest in opposition to the choice the FISA (now FIA) introduced a listing of different grievances in opposition to Senna. The motive force suspected the interference of president Jean-Marie Balestre, “whether or not out of patriotism, friendship or for different causes I desire to not point out.”
Luckily for the governing physique, McLaren’s makes an attempt to overturn the choice have been rendered moot when Senna crashed out of the ultimate race of the season at Adelaide. In blind spray on the again straight, he got here throughout Martin Brundle driving at part-throttle and slammed into the again of the Brabham.
Advert | Turn into a RaceFans supporter and
Over to you
What different stewards’ choices from previous title fights stand out as significantly controversial? Does Piastri’s penalty deserve a spot on this listing? Have your say within the feedback.
Miss nothing from RaceFans
Get a day by day e mail with all our newest tales – and nothing else. No advertising, no adverts. Enroll right here:
F1 prime tens
Learn extra prime tens
