https://preview.redd.it/72jimqkxi8ne1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfea29423e664177b1b2ec5a8dfc5eabc5c67f15

For many years, Method 1 followers have debated the GOAT (Biggest of All Time). Schumacher? Senna?

However a 2009 econometric research by researchers Reiner Eichenberger and David Stadelmann analyzed 57 years of F1 information (1950-2006) to separate driver talent from automotive efficiency. The outcomes would possibly shock you:

🥇 #1 – Juan Manuel Fangio (5-time champion, received 47% of his races) 🥈 #2 – Jim Clark (Dominated within the Sixties, however typically held again by reliability points) 🥉 #3 – Michael Schumacher (Good, however the research suggests his Ferrari benefit performed a job)

Different notable rankings: 🔹 Fernando Alonso (sixth) & Kimi Räikkönen (eleventh) – Greater than you would possibly anticipate! 🔹 Ayrton Senna (twenty fifth) – His aggressive fashion and better crash price impacted his rating 🔹 Mark Webber (twenty seventh) – The highest-ranked Australian driver, forward of Jack Brabham (forty seventh)

The research argues that Fangio’s consistency, adaptability, and uncooked driving expertise made him the best, as he received every time his automotive didn’t break down. In the meantime, Schumacher dominated his period however had important automotive benefits.

📊 Full rankings & research breakdown right here: Article hyperlink

What do you assume? Do you agree with Fangio as #1, or ought to Schumacher/Senna be on prime?