[ad_1]
The FIA has reacted to Tim Mayer’s declare that the election course of is undemocratic and primarily solely permits for one candidate.
“The FIA Presidential election is a structured and democratic course of, to make sure equity and integrity at each stage,” mentioned a spokesperson. “The necessities for the 2025 FIA elections, together with the related deadlines and eligibility standards for the Presidential Checklist and World Councils, are outlined within the FIA Statutes and Inner Laws, that are publicly obtainable on the FIA’s web site.
“Detailed info concerning these elections has additionally been made obtainable on a devoted web page on the FIA’s web site since 13 June 2025 and communicated to all FIA Members,” they added.
“The necessities associated to the regional illustration of the Vice-Presidents for Sport, and to pick them from the World Motor Sport Council with a purpose to draw up a Presidential Checklist, are usually not new. These standards utilized to earlier elections.
“As to be anticipated, making ready a candidature for a Presidential Checklist or the World Councils requires sure steps to be taken. Potential candidates have had because the publication of the detailed info on 13 June to organize their functions.”
Referring to the report by the Utrecht College of Governance, the spokesperson mentioned: “The report commissioned by Tim Mayer’s crew finds the FIA’s governance practices to be according to different federations, notably these “which have made progress in formalising governance constructions”.
“The benchmarking course of outlined inside the report doesn’t discover the FIA to be behind the curve,” they added. “This displays the truth that the FIA has taken a number of steps to strengthen its company governance insurance policies.
“The FIA was not contacted to substantiate any of the statements or assumptions made about its processes, insurance policies and administration inside the report.”
[ad_2]
Source link
